The Study on Comparison of Electrochemical Performance in Microbial Fuel Cell with Glucose and Sodium Acetate Acting as Substrates

Authors

Lei FAN, nstitute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
Yu ZHAO, nstitute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
Ting LI, nstitute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
Qin-bo YUAN, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100000, China
En-zhi WANG, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100000, China
Xiao-bin WANG, nstitute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
Jun-wen WANG, nstitute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;Follow

Corresponding Author

Jun-wen WANG(1935955327@qq.com)

Abstract

By inoculating aerobic sludge and anaerobic sludge from the sewage treatment plant, two sets of dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were built with either glucose or sodium acetate acting as a substrate. Accordingly, the electrochemical performances of MFCs were explored with the concentration of the substrates being 0.0335 mol•L^-1. The results of the comparative study in glucose system and sodium acetate system showed that the impedance values of anodic half cell were 222 Ω for glucose and 213.67 Ω for sodium acetate, implying no significant effect on the internal resistance in battery with the different substrates. The exchange current densities were 3.463 mA•m^-2 and 5.987 mA•m^-2, while the COD removal rates 50.6% and 55.8% for glucose and sodium acetate, respectively. Furthermore, the coulombic efficiencies reached 42.1% and 46.2% with the maximum output power density of 394.2 mW•m^-2 and 311.9 mW•m^-2 for glucose and sodium acetate, respectively. Since the process of glucose metabolism is more complicated with less complete metabolism as compared with the simpler sodium acetate molecules with more facilitated metabolism, the coulombic efficiency and COD removal rate in sodium acetate system were higher than those in glucose system, which led to better eletricity production capacity.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell, glucose, sodium acetate, electrochemical performance

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.13208/j.electrochem.150926

Publication Date

2016-02-29

Online Available Date

2015-12-01

Revised Date

2015-11-10

Received Date

2015-09-26

Recommended Citation

Lei FAN, Yu ZHAO, Ting LI, Qin-bo YUAN, En-zhi WANG, Xiao-bin WANG, Jun-wen WANG. The Study on Comparison of Electrochemical Performance in Microbial Fuel Cell with Glucose and Sodium Acetate Acting as Substrates[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2016 , 22(1): 150926.
DOI: 10.13208/j.electrochem.150926
Available at: https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol22/iss1/14

References

[1] F.J. Hernández-Fernández, A. Pérez de los Ríos, M.J. Salar-García, V.M. Ortiz-Martínez, L.J. Lozano-Blanco, C. Godínez, F. Tomás-Alonso, J. Recent progress and perspectives in microbial fuel cells for bioenergy generation and wastewater treatment[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138: 284-297.

[2] Hou M(侯明), Yi B L(衣宝廉). Progress and perspective of fuel cell technology[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2012, 18(1): 1-13.

[3] Liu H, Cheng S A, Logan B E. Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2005, 39 (2), 658-662.

[4] Kim J R, Jung S H, Regan J M, et al. Electricity generation and microbial community analysis of alcohol powered microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(13): 2568-2577.

[5] Anna Vilajeliu-Pons, Sebastià Puig, Narcís Pous, Inmaculada Salcedo-Dávila, Lluís Bañeras, Maria Dolors Balaguer, Jesús Colprim. Microbiome characterization of MFCs used for the treatment of swine manure[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 288: 60-68.

[6] Wang J Q(汪家权), Xia X L(夏雪兰), Ding W W(丁巍巍). Operating parameters for a microbial fuel cell in treating phenol-containing wastewater[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2010, 30(4): 735- 741.

[7] Dong Y, Qu Y P, He W H, et al. A 90-liter stackable baffled microbial fuel cell for brewery wastewater treatment based on energy self-sufficient mode[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 195: 66-72.

[8] Wen Q, Wu Y, Zhao L X, et al. Electricity generation and brewery wastewater treatment from sequential anode-cathode microbial fuel cell[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2010, 11(2): 87-93.

[9] Motos P R, Heijne A, Weijden R, et al. High rate copper and energy recovery in microbial fuel cells[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, 6: 1-8.

[10] Rikame S S, Mungray A A, Mungray A K. Electricity generation from acidogenic food waste leachate using dual chamber mediator less microbial fuel cell [J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2012, 75(2012): 131-137.

[11] Chae K J, Choi M J, Lee J W, et al. Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(14): 3518-3525.

[12] Liu C M(刘春梅), Liu L(刘磊), Xu B(徐斌), et al. Effects of inlet substrate and buffer concentrations on MFC performance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2015, 38(2)： 48-51.

[13] Larrosa G A, Scott K, Head I M, et al. Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(12) : 3985-3994.

[14] Liao Q, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Electricity generation and COD removal of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) operated with alkaline substrates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(33): 19349-19354.

[15] Liu Z D, Liu J, Zhang S P, et al. Study of operational performance and electrical response on mediator-less microbial fuel cells fed with carbon- and protein-rich substrates[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 45(3): 185-191.

[16] Bao Y(宝玥), Wu X Q(吴霞琴). Progress in research for biofuel cell[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2004, 10(1): 1-8

[17] Yu J R(于景荣), Xing D M(邢丹敏), Liu F Q(刘富强), et al. Research progress on proton exchange membranes of fuel cells[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2001, 7(4): 385-395.

[18] He Z, Wagner N, Minteer S D, et al. An upflow microbial fuel cell with an Interior cathode: assessment of the internal resistance by impedance spectroscopy[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5212-5217.

[19] Katz E, Willner I. Probing bimolecular interactions at conductive and semiconductive surfaces by impedance spectroscopy: routes to impedimetric immunosensors, DNA sensor, and enzyme biosensors[J]. Electroanalysis, 2003, 15, 913-947.

[20] Wagner N. Characterization of membrane electrode assemblies in polymer electrolyte fuel cells using a.c. impedance spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2002, 32: 859-863.

[21] Hou M Y(侯孟炎), Wang K(王珂), Dong X L(董晓丽), et al. Synthesis graphene wrapped Li-rich layered metal oxide and its electrochemical performance[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2015, 21(3): 195-200.

[22] Rabaey K, Boon N, Siciliano S D, et al. Biofuel cells select for microbial consortia that self-mediate electron transfer[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(9): 5373-5382.

[23] Reguera G, Mccarthy K D, Metha T. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires[J]. Nature, 2005, 455: 1098-1101.

[24] Cheng S A, Liu H, Logan B E. Power densities using different cathode catalysts(Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders(Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2006, 40(1): 364-369.

[25] 查全性. 电极过程动力学导论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 130-139.

[26] Kim J R, Premier G C, Hawkes F R, et al. Modular tubular microbial fuel cells for energy recovery during sucrose wastewater treatment at low organic loading rate[J]. Bioresour Technology, 2010, 101(4): 1190-1198.