Abstract
Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) have attracted intensive attention in scientific and industrial fields due to their high molar extinction coefficient, spectral tunability by particle size, ease of fabrication, and low cost. In the past years, semiconductor metal sulfides have attracted extensive attention because of their attractive physical and chemical properties for potential applications in many fields,such as PbS, CuS, CoS and CdS. In particular, copper sulfides have become a promising candidate for counter electrode materials in QDSSCs for their outstanding electrochemical and catalytic properties. In order to explore more stable and efficient copper sulfide counter electrode materials, in this work, we used three different methods to synthesize copper sulfide nanosheet arrays (marked as CuS-1, CuS-2, CuS-3), which were then characterized by XRD, SEM and electrochemical workstation. XRD patterns showed that all the three samples were copper sulfide (Cu:S = 1:1). And SEM images revealed that the fabrication methods of CuS significantly affected their morphologies. . The obtained CuS-1, CuS-2 and CuS-3 nanosheet arrays exhibited enhanced PCEs up to 2.92%,2.58% and 3.27%, respectively, when used as CEs in QDSSCs, implying increases of 87%,65% and 109% as compared to Pt-based QDSSCs, respectively. Through all the characterizations, we found that the CuS-3 showed the best catalytic activity in the reduction of polysulfide electrolyte among the three samples.
Graphical Abstract
Publication Date
2016-08-29
Online Available Date
2016-05-18
Revised Date
2016-05-10
Received Date
2016-03-16
Recommended Citation
Xiao-dan HONG, Zi-jie XU, Fa-yin ZHANG, Yu-peng LI, Mei-dan YE, Chang-jian LIN, Wen-xi GUO.
Fabrications of three copper sulfide counter electrodes and their influences on photovoltaic properties in QDSSCs[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry,
2016
,
22(4): 160146.
DOI: 10.13208/j.electrochem.160146
Available at:
https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol22/iss4/13
References
1. Zhang Q X, Zhang Y D, Huang S Q, et al. Application of carbon counterelectrode on CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) [J].Electrochemistry Communications, 2010,12(2):327-330.
2. Jun H K, Careem M A, Arof A K. Quantum dot-sensitized solar cellsperspective and recent developments: A review of Cd chalcogenide quantum dots as sensitizers [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013,22:148-167.
3. Cui J B, Li Y J, Liu L, et al. Near-Infrared Plasmonic-Enhanced Solar Energy Harvest for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Reactions [J]. Nano Letters, 2015,15(10):6295-6301.
4. Sudhagar P, Song T, Lee D H, et al. High Open Circuit Voltage Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cells Manufactured with ZnO Nanowire Arrays and Si/ZnO Branched Hierarchical Structures [J].Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2011,2(16):1984-1990.
5. Rühle S, Shalom M, Zaban A. Quantum-Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells [J]. Chemphyschem, 2010,11(11):2290-2304.
6. Guo W X, Chen C, Ye M D, et al. Carbon fiber/Co9S8 nanotube arrays hybrid structures for flexible quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Nanoscale, 2014,6(7):3656-3663.
7. Ye M D, Chen C, Lv M Q, et al. Facile and effective synthesis of hierarchical TiO2 spheres for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells [J]. Nanoscale, 2013,5(14):6577-6583.
8. Li L L, Zhu P N, Peng S J, et al. Controlled Growth of CuS on Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers as an Efficient Counter Electrode for Quantum Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014,118(30):16526-16535.
9. Tian J J, Zhang Q F, Zhang L L, et al. ZnO/TiO2 nanocable structured photoelectrodes for CdS/CdSe quantum dot co-sensitized solar cells [J]. Nanoscale, 2013,5(3):936-943.
10. Wang H B, Kubo T, Nakazaki J, et al. PbS-Quantum-Dot-Based Heterojunction Solar Cells Utilizing ZnO Nanowires for High External Quantum Efficiency in the Near-Infrared Region [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2013,4(15):2455-2460.
11. Wu M X, Lin X, Wang Y D, et al. Counter electrode materials combined with redox couples in dye- and quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015,3(39):19638-19656.
12. Jiang Y, Yu B B, Liu J, et al. Boosting the Open Circuit Voltage and Fill Factor of QDSSCs Using Hierarchically Assembled ITO@Cu2S Nanowire Array Counter Electrodes [J]. Nano Letters, 2015,15(5):3088-3095.
13. Ye M D, Chen C, Zhang N, et al. Quantum-Dot Sensitized Solar Cells Employing Hierarchical Cu2S Microspheres Wrapped by Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanosheets as Effective Counter Electrodes [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2014:201301564.
14. Jiao S H, Xu L F, Jiang K, et al. Well‐Defined Non‐spherical Copper Sulfide Mesocages with Single‐Crystalline Shells by Shape‐Controlled Cu2O Crystal Templating [J]. Advanced Materials, 2006,18(9):1174-1177.
15. Nan Z D, Wang X Y, Zhao Z B. Formation of various morphologies of copper sulfides by a solvothermal method [J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2006,295(1):92-96.
16. Basu M, Sinha AK, Pradhan M, Sarkar S, Negishi Y, Pal T. Evolution of Hierarchical Hexagonal Stacked Plates of CuS from Liquid Liquid Interface and its Photocatalytic Application for Oxidative Degradation of Different Dyes under Indoor Lighting [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,44(16):6313-6318.
17. Luther J M, Gao J, Lloyd M T, et al. Stability Assessment on a 3% Bilayer PbS/ZnO Quantum Dot Heterojunction Solar Cell [J]. Advanced Materials, 2010,22(33):3704-3707.
18. Yu X L, Cao C B, Zhu H S, et al. Nanometer‐Sized Copper Sulfide Hollow Spheres with Strong Optical‐Limiting Properties [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2007,17(8):1397-1401.
19. Gao J N, Li Q S, Zhao H B, et al. One-pot synthesis of uniform Cu2O and CuS hollow spheres and their optical limiting properties [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2008,20(19):6263-6269.
20. Ye M D, Xin X K, Lin C J, et al. High Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Hierarchically Structured Nanotubes [J]. Nano Letters, 2011,11(8):3214-3220.
21. Li T L, Lee Y L, Teng H. High-performance quantum dot-sensitized solar cells based on sensitization with CuInS2 quantum dots/CdS heterostructure [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012,5(1):5315-5324.
22. Yang Z, Chen C Y, Liu C W, et al. Electrocatalytic sulfur electrodes for CdS/CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Chemical Communications, 2010,46(30):5485-5487.
23. Grozdanov I, Najdoski M. Optical and electrical properties of copper sulfide films of variable composition [J]. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 1995,114(2):469-475.
24. Chen C, Ye M D, Zhang N, et al. Preparation of hollow Co9S8 nanoneedle arrays as effective counter electrodes for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015,3(12):6311-6314.
25. Guo W X, Chen C, Ye M D, et al. Carbon fiber/Co9S8 nanotube arrays hybrid structures for flexible quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Nanoscale, 2014,6(7):3656-3663.
26. Chen C, Ye M D, Lv M Q, et al. Ultralong Rutile TiO2 Nanorod Arrays with Large Surface Area for CdS/CdSe Quantum Dot-sensitized Solar Cells [J]. Electrochimica Acta 2014,121:175-182.
27. Kumar P, Gusain M, Nagarajan R. Synthesis of Cu1. 8S and CuS from Copper-Thiourea Containing Precursors; Anionic (Cl, NO3, SO42) Influence on the Product Stoichiometry [J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2011,50(7):3065-3070.
28. Ye M D, Wen X R, Zhang N, et al. In situ growth of CuS and Cu1.8S nanosheet arrays as efficient counter electrodes for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015,3(18):9595-9600.
29. Guan X F, Huang S Q, Zhang Q X, et al. Front-side illuminated CdS/CdSe quantum dots co-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanotube arrays [J]. Nanotechnology, 2011,22(46):465402.
Included in
Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons