Abstract
Based on the equivalent circuit model, by considering both the dynamic gas pressure model and the dynamic heat transfer model, a lumped parameter model is developed. The start process of the fuel cell is simulated by using SIMULINK software. The undershoot of the voltage is observed from the simulation results, and the response time of the voltage is basically the same as that of the fuel cell temperature, which indicates that the temperature has great influence on the dynamic performance of the fuel cell. From the perspective of the temperature, the dynamic responses of the thermodynamic potential, the activation overvoltage, the ohmic overvoltage and the concentration overvoltage of the fuel cell iare analyzed. It is found that the overshoot of the activation overvoltage and the ohmic overvoltage cause the voltage undershoot. When the temperature is input in the form of a step signal, the output voltage response of the fuel cell is fast, and thus, undershoot and overshoot do not occur. Therefore, it can improve the dynamic performance of the fuel cell with the increasing of temperature response speed.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cell, dynamic modeling, undershoot, temperature, dynamic, performance analysis
Publication Date
2018-04-28
Online Available Date
2017-07-26
Revised Date
2017-07-07
Received Date
2017-06-07
Recommended Citation
Yan XIAO, Ying-jie CHANG, Wei ZHANG, Qiu-hong JIA.
Simulation Analysis in Dynamic Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell under Starting Condition[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry,
2018
,
24(2): 166-173.
DOI: 10.13208/j.electrochem.170607
Available at:
https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol24/iss2/9
References
[1] Larminie J, Dicks A. Fuel cell systems explained, 2nd Edition[M]. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003: 23-24.
[2] Han M, Chan S H, Jiang S P. Investigation of self-humidifying anode in polymer electrolyte fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(3):385-391.
[3] Mann R F, Amphlett J C, Hooper M A I, et al. Development and application of a generalised steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2000, 86(1/2):173-180.
[4] Khan M J, Iqbal M T. Modelling and Analysis of electro-chemical, thermal, and reactant flow dynamics for a PEM fuel cell system[J]. Fuel Cells, 2005, 5(4):463-475.
[5] Xue X, Tang J, Smirnova A, et al. System level lumped-parameter dynamic modeling of PEM fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 133(2):188204.
[6] Pathapati P R, Xue X, Tang J. A new dynamic model for predicting transient phenomena in a PEM fuel cell system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2005, 30(1):1-22.
[7] Li Q(李奇), Chen W R(陈维荣), Jia J B(贾俊波), et al. Improved dynamic modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of System Simulation(系统仿真学报), 2009, 21(12):3588-3591.
[8] Tang Y, Yuan W, Pan M, et al. Experimental investigation of dynamic performance and transient responses of a kW-class PEM fuel cell stack under various load changes[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(4):1410-1417.
[9] Jian Q, Zhao Y, Wang H. An experimental study of the dynamic behavior of a 2kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack under various loading conditions[J]. Energy, 2015, 80:740-745.
[10]O'Hayre R, Cha S W, Colella W, et al. Fuel Cell fundamentals[M].Beijing:Publishing House of Electronics Industry(电子工业出版社), 2007:50-77.
[11] Jia Q H(贾秋红), Han M(韩明), Deng B(邓斌), et al. Dynamic modeling and characteristic analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2011(4):438-443.
[12] Mench M M. Fuel cell engines[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2008:157-163.
[13] Corrêa J M, Farret F A, Canha L N, et al. An electrochemical-based fuel-cell model suitable for electrical engineering automation approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2004, 51(5):1103-1112.
[14] Amphlett J C, Mann R F, Peppley B A , et al. A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 1996, 61(1/2):183-188.
Included in
Analytical Chemistry Commons, Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Commons, Computational Chemistry Commons, Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Power and Energy Commons