Abstract
Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are the key component of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. For a long time, much attention has been paid to develop MEA technology. At present, the research, development and industrialization of fuel cell has entered a new era. More strict requirements for MEA, especially for the reduction of Pt loading with a challenging target of 0.125 mg·W-1 have to be met. In this paper, the performance losses under low Pt loading are analyzed in terms of activation polarization, ohm polarization and mass-transfer polarization. It is proposed that research should be focused on the activity of the catalyst under the fuel cell operating voltage (0.6 V ~ 0.8 V),and the reasonability of using charge-transfer resistance as the indicator of catalyst activity is discussed. In terms of optimization potential capacity, mass transfer polarization > activation polarization > ohm polarization. Residual performance loss associated with low cathode Pt loading can be mitigated by optimizing the catalytic layer structure, where oxygen flux through the ionomer film to the Pt surface should be minimized with high proton conduction.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
membrane electrode assemblies, Pt loading, polarization over-potential, charge-transfer resistance, catalytic layer structure
Publication Date
2018-12-28
Online Available Date
2018-10-12
Revised Date
2018-09-27
Received Date
2018-09-05
Recommended Citation
Yan RAO, Shang LI, Fen ZHOU, Tian TIAN, Qing ZHONG, Zhao-hui WAN, Jin-ting TAN, Mu PAN.
Fuel cell performance curve after MEA optimization Structural Optimization of Low Pt Membrane Electrode Assembly[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry,
2018
,
24(6): 677-686.
DOI: 10.13208/j.electrochem.180843
Available at:
https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol24/iss6/9
References
[1] The US Department of Energy. Energy efficiency and renewable energy[EB/OL]. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/05/f34/fcto_myrdd_fuel_cells.pdf
[2] 中华人民共和国科学技术部重点研发计划专项[EB/OL]. http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201511/t20151118_122421.htm
[3] 2016 DOE annual merit report: FC136-electrocatalysts and supports (2016-06-08)[EB/OL]. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review16/fc136_borup_2016_o.pdf
[4] Debe M K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells[J]. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 43-51.
[5] Yuan X Z, Song C, Wang H, et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in PEM Fuel Cells[M]. Springer London, 2010.
[6] Gasteiger H A, Kocha S S, Sompalli B, et al. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs[J]. Applied Catalysis B Environmental, 2005, 56(1): 9-35.
[7] Salgado J R C, Ermete Antolini A, Gonzalez E R. Structure and activity of carbon-supported Pt-Co electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(46): 17767-17774.
[8] Shinagawa T, Garciaesparza A T, Takanabe K. Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5:13801.
[9] Chen J(陈骏). Research on internal resistance in proton exchange membrane fuel cells with metal bipolar plates[D]. Wuhan University of Technology(武汉理工大学), 2014.
[10] Cimenti M, Bessarabov D, Tam M, et al. Investigation of proton transport in the catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[C]// The Electrochemical Society. Symposium on Electrode Processes Relevant to Fuel Cell Technology held during the 217th Meeting of the Electrochemical-Society (ECS), April 25-
30, 2010, Vancouver, Canada, 2010: 147-157.
[11] Makharia R, Mathias M F, Baker D R. Measurement of catalyst layer electrolyte resistance in PEFCs using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Computers & Biomedical Research An International Journal, 2005, 152(5): A970-A977.
[12] Liu Y, Murphy M, Baker D, et al. Determination of electrode sheet resistance in cathode catalyst layer by AC impedance[J]. ECS Transactions, 2007, 11(1) :473-484.
[13] Kusoglu A, Weber A Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(3): 987-1104.
[14] Li S(李赏), Zhou F(周芬), Chen L(陈磊), et al. Dynamic simulation of oxygen reduction reaction in Pt/C electrode for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2016, 22(2): 129-134.
[15] Nonoyama N, Okazaki S, Weber A Z, et al. Analysis of oxygen-transport diffusion resistance in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(4): B416-B423.
[16] Weber A Z, Kusoglu A. Unexplained transport resistances for low-loaded fuel-cell catalyst layers[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(41): 17207-17211.
[17] Wang S Z, Li X H, Wan Z H, et al. Effect of hydrophobic additive on oxygen transport in catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 379: 338-343.
[18] Wan Z H, Liu S F, Zhong Q, et al. Mechanism of improving oxygen transport resistance of polytetrafluoroethylene in catalyst layer for polymer electrolyte fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(15): 7456-7464.
[19] Paul D K, Fraser A, Karan K. Towards the understanding of proton conduction mechanism in PEMFC catalyst layer: Conductivity of adsorbed Nafion films[J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2011, 13(8): 774-777.
Included in
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Commons, Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Power and Energy Commons