Abstract
Glassy carbon electrode (GCE) is a common basic electrode for various electrochemical sensors, and the detection properties are determined by its interfacial characteristics. In this paper, we established an equivalent circuit including electrolyte resistance (Rel), charge transport resistance (Rct), diffusion impedance (Rdi, Cdi), electrochemical (oxidation/reduction) reaction impedance (RR, CR), surface adsorption impedance (Rads , Cads), double-layer capacitance (CDL), and derived the mathematical expression for the equivalent circuit. The Rel and CDL are contributed by inactive ions in electrolyte to produce non-faradaic impedance, while the Rct and RR are contributed by the active ions of redox reaction in electrolyte to produce faradaic impedance. The Rct directly corresponds to the electrode potential (E) of the reaction, which represents the difficulty of electrode reaction. When the potential E is the only state variable in the impedance spectrum of electrode reaction, that is, there is only one time constant in the impedance spectrum, the Rct can represent the whole Faraday impedance of the system. However, when the electrode reaction is also affected by other variables such as diffusion, surface film or surface adsorption ion coverage, the Faraday impedance of the system also includes the impedance produced by the diffusion impedance and the changes of the surface film (RR, CR) and the coverage of the surface absorbed ions caused by electrochemical reaction (Rads, Cads). The impedance spectrum of the electrode system in different states were simulated by changing the five parameters of the mathematical expression. The contribution of different factors to the impedance spectrum of GCE was revealed. Finally, the impedance spectra of bare/modified GCE in potassium ferricyanide solution were analyzed by the mathematical model. The fitting results are in good agreement with the experimental data. Based on the parameters obtained by fitting, the changes of the electrode surface characteristic before and after modifications were quantitatively compared and analyzed. The charge transport resistance increases from 5827.8 Ω to 25104.3 Ω, and the diffusion conductance of Fe3+/Fe2+ ions on the electrode surface also increases by an order of magnitude. However, there is no significant difference with the double-layer capacitance and the frequency dispersion coefficient. The surface of the modified electrode remains electrically neutral. The aggregation state and oxidation-reduction mechanism of Fe3+/Fe2+ on the electrode surface are the same as those on the bare GCE surface.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
glass carbon electrode, impedance spectroscopy, equivalent circuit, interface characteristics, dielectric relaxation
Publication Date
2021-10-28
Online Available Date
2020-11-10
Revised Date
2020-10-16
Received Date
2020-08-24
Recommended Citation
Lei Cheng, Pu-Xuan Yan, You-Jun Fan, Hua-Hong Zou, Hong Liang.
Mathematical Expression and Quantitative Analysis of Impedance Spectrum on the Interface of Glassy Carbon Electrode[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry,
2021
,
27(5): 518-528.
DOI: Glassy carbon electrode (GCE) is a common basic electrode for various electrochemical sensors, and the detection properties are determined by its interfacial characteristics. In this paper, we established an equivalent circuit including electrolyte resistance (Rel), charge transport resistance (Rct), diffusion impedance (Rdi, Cdi), electrochemical (oxidation/reduction) reaction impedance (RR, CR), surface adsorption impedance (Rads , Cads), double-layer capacitance (CDL), and derived the mathematical expression for the equivalent circuit. The Rel and CDL are contributed by inactive ions in electrolyte to produce non-faradaic impedance, while the Rct and RR are contributed by the active ions of redox reaction in electrolyte to produce faradaic impedance. The Rct directly corresponds to the electrode potential (E) of the reaction, which represents the difficulty of electrode reaction. When the potential E is the only state variable in the impedance spectrum of electrode reaction, that is, there is only one time constant in the impedance spectrum, the Rct can represent the whole Faraday impedance of the system. However, when the electrode reaction is also affected by other variables such as diffusion, surface film or surface adsorption ion coverage, the Faraday impedance of the system also includes the impedance produced by the diffusion impedance and the changes of the surface film (RR, CR) and the coverage of the surface absorbed ions caused by electrochemical reaction (Rads, Cads). The impedance spectrum of the electrode system in different states were simulated by changing the five parameters of the mathematical expression. The contribution of different factors to the impedance spectrum of GCE was revealed. Finally, the impedance spectra of bare/modified GCE in potassium ferricyanide solution were analyzed by the mathematical model. The fitting results are in good agreement with the experimental data. Based on the parameters obtained by fitting, the changes of the electrode surface characteristic before and after modifications were quantitatively compared and analyzed. The charge transport resistance increases from 5827.8 Ω to 25104.3 Ω, and the diffusion conductance of Fe3+/Fe2+ ions on the electrode surface also increases by an order of magnitude. However, there is no significant difference with the double-layer capacitance and the frequency dispersion coefficient. The surface of the modified electrode remains electrically neutral. The aggregation state and oxidation-reduction mechanism of Fe3+/Fe2+ on the electrode surface are the same as those on the bare GCE surface.
Available at: https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol27/iss5/10
References
[1] Zhu C Z, Yang G H, Li H, Du D, Lin Y H. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures[J]. Anal. Chem., 2015, 87(1): 230-249.
doi: 10.1021/ac5039863 URL
[2] Couper A M, Pletcher D, Walsh F C. Electrode materials for electrosynjournal[J]. Chem. Rev., 1990, 90(5): 837-865.
doi: 10.1021/cr00103a010 URL
[3] Zhu C Z, Yang G H, Li H, Du D, Lin Y H. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures[J]. Anal. Chem., 2015, 87(1): 230-249.
doi: 10.1021/ac5039863 URL
[4] Zhuang J Y, Fu L B, Xu M D, Yang H H, Chen G N, Tang D P. Sensitive electrochemical monitoring of nucleic acids coupling DNA nanostructures with hybridization chain reaction[J]. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 783: 17-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.04.049 URL
[5] Ulubay S, Dursun Z. Cu nanoparticles incorporated polypyrrole modified GCE for sensitive simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid[J]. Talanta, 2010, 80(3): 1461-1466.
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.09.054 URL
[6] Alwarappan S, Liu G, Li C Z. Simultaneous detection of dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid at electrochemically pretreated carbon nanotube biosensors[J]. Nanomed. -Nanotechnol., 2010, 6(1): 52-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.06.003 URL
[7] Zhu X H, Liang Y, Zuo X X, Hu R P, Xiao X, Nan J M. Novel water-soluble multi-nanopore graphene modified glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 143: 366-373.
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.044 URL
[8] Aldana-González J, Palomar-Pardavé M, Corona-Avendaño S, de Oca MGM, Ramirez-Silva M T, Romero-Romo M. Gold nanoparticles modified-ITO electrode for the selective electrochemical quantification of dopamine in the presence of uric and ascorbic acids[J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2013, 706: 69-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.07.037 URL
[9] Li M J, Guo W L, Li H J, Dai W, Yang B H. Electrochemical biosensor based on one-dimensional MgO nanostructures for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid[J]. Sensor Actuat. B - Chem., 2014, 204: 629-636.
doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.022 URL
[10] Babaei A, Taheri A R. Nafion/Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles-carbon nanotube composite modified glassy carbon electrode as a sensor for simultaneous determination of dopamine and serotonin in the presence of ascorbic acid[J]. Sensor Actuat. B - Chem., 2013, 176: 543-551.
doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.09.021 URL
[11] Yang S L, Li G, Yin Y L, Yang R, Li J J, Qu L B. Nano-sized copper oxide/multi-wall carbon nanotube/Nafion modified electrode for sensitive detection of dopamine[J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2013, 703: 45-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.04.020 URL
[12] Cheng L, Fan Y J, Shen X C, Liang H. Highly sensitive detection of dopamine at ionic liquid functionalized RGO/ZIF-8 nanocomposite-modified electrode[J]. J. Nano-mater., 2019: 8936095.
[13] Zhang Z J, Huang J, Wu X Z, Zhang W Z, Chen S Y. Im-pedance study of the electrochemical reduction of adreno-chrome on glassy carbon[J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998, 444(2): 169-172.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00576-7 URL
[14] Fang Y H(方亚辉), Liu Z P(刘智攀). Insight into the important solid/liquid double layer from first-principles calculations[J]. J. Electrochem.(电化学), 2020, 26(1): 32-40.
[15] Shi M L(史美伦). Principle and application of AC impe-dance spectroscopy[M]. Beijing: National Defence Industrial Press(国防工业出版社), 2001.
[16] Wang B, Jing R, Qi H L, Gao Q, Zhang C X. Label-free electrochemical impedance peptide-based biosensor for the detection of cardiac troponin I incorporating gold nanoparticles modified carbon electrode[J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2016, 781: 212-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.08.005 URL
[17] Zhang J Q(张鉴清). Electrochemical measurement technology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press(化学工业出版社), 2010.
[18] Oliveiraa M, Correiab M, Diniza F. Concanavalin A and polyvinyl butyral use as a potential dengue electrochemical biosensor[J]. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2009, 25(4): 728-732.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.08.009 pmid: 19747814
[19] Li B L, Wang Y L, Wei H, Dong S J. Amplified electrochemical aptasensor taking AuNPs based sandwich sensing platform as a model[J]. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2008, 23(7): 965-970.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2007.09.019 URL
[20] Diakowski P M, Xiao Y Z, Petryk M W P, Kraatz H B. Impedance based detection of chemical warfare agent mimics using ferrocene-lysine modified carbon nanotubes[J]. Anal. Chem., 2010, 82(8): 3191-3197.
doi: 10.1021/ac902694d pmid: 20329758
[21] Reybier K, Ribaut C, Coste A, Launay J, Fabre P L, Ne-pveu F. Characterization of oxidative stress in leishmaniasis-infected or LPS-stimulated macrophages using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2010, 25(12): 2566-2572.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.04.021 pmid: 20488689
[22] Heiduschka P, Dittrich J. Impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry at bare and polymer coated glassy carbon electrodes[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 1992, 37(14): 2573-2580.
doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(92)87054-4 URL
[23] MacDonald D. Transient techniques in electrochemistry[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.
[24] MacDonald J R. Impedance spectroscopy-emphasizing solid materials and systems[M]. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1987.
[25] Košicek K M, Kvastek K, Horvat-Radoševic V. Different charge storage mechanisms at some carbon electrodes in redox active electrolyte revealed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 195: 77-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.140 URL
[26] Rodrigues D R, Olivieri A C, Fragoso W D, Lemos S G. Complex numbers-partial least-squares applied to the treatment of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data[J]. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2019, 1080: 1-11.
doi: S0003-2670(19)30869-4 pmid: 31409458
Included in
Analytical Chemistry Commons, Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Power and Energy Commons