Abstract
Lithium metal is considered as an ideal anode material for next-generation high energy density batteries with its high specific capacity and low electrode potential. However, the high activity of lithium metal can lead to a series of safety issues. For example, lithium metal will continuously react chemically with the electrolyte, forming unstable the solid electrolyte (SEI) films. In addition, lithium dendrites can be formed during cycling, which can puncture the SEI film and cause short circuits in the battery. These drawbacks greatly hinder the commercial application of lithium metal. To solve the above problems, it is important to understand the structure of SEI and the underlying mechanism of its formation as a guide for rational design. Quantum mechanics (QM) has been demonstrated as an effective tool to investigate the chemical reactions and microscopic atomic structures of SEI. However, QM is computationally too expensive to be used for large-scale and long-term theoretical simulations. Instead, the molecular mechanics (MM) method has much orders higher computational efficiency than QM, and can be used for large-scale and long-time theoretical simulations. However, the accuracy of MM is usually not guaranteed, especially for complex SEI. Therefore, a practical solution is to combine the advantages of both. In this work, we use the hybrid ab initio and reactive molecule dynamics (HAIRs) approach to describe chemical reactions with the accuracy of quantum chemistry and improve the computational efficiency by more than 10 times with mixing QM and MM. Using this method, we have investigated the interfacial reaction mechanism of two electrolyte solutions, 1 mol·L-1 LiTFSI-DME (dimethoxyethane) and 1 mol·L-1 LiTFSI-EC (ethylene carbonate) with the lithium metal anode. The simulation results show that TFSI anion prefers to be decomposed, while DME does not, thus, TFSI plays the vital role of protecting DME. However, in the LiTFSI-EC system, both TFSI anion and EC are decomposed, indicating that EC is less stable and not suitable to the formation of stable SEI. Thanks to the computational efficiency of the HAIRs method, we have completed the 1 ns simulation in a few days. Using the hardware, the above calculation would take at least one to two months if only the QM method was employed. Meanwhile the long HAIRs calculation shows that for the simulation of chemical reactions in SEI, at least 1 ns is essential. Instead, previous molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with a few ps, or tens of ps, are insufficient to fully capture the critical chemical reactions. The above simulation results provide reliable experience for the computational simulation study of SEI formation, and lay the theoretical foundation for the rational design of electrolytes and the development of high-performance electrolyte solution systems.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
lithium metal battery, solid electrolyte interface, multi-scale theoretical simulation, electrochemical reaction, electrolyte design
Publication Date
2022-04-28
Online Available Date
2022-04-28
Revised Date
2021-08-04
Received Date
2021-05-18
Recommended Citation
Yan-Yan Zhang, Yue Liu, Yi-Ming Lu, Pei-Ping Yu, Wen-Xuan Du, Bing-Yun Ma, Miao Xie, Hao Yang, Tao Cheng.
Multi-Scale Simulation Revealing the Decomposition Mechanism of Electrolyte on Lithium Metal Electrode[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry,
2022
,
28(4): 2105181.
DOI: 10.13208/j.electrochem.210518
Available at:
https://jelectrochem.xmu.edu.cn/journal/vol28/iss4/6
References
[1]
Li M, Lu J, Chen Z W, Amine K. 30 Years of lithium-ion batteries[J]. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(33): 1800561.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201800561
URL
[2]
Tarascon J M, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries[J]. Nature, 2001, 414(6861): 359-367.
doi: 10.1038/35104644
URL
[3] Li P, Hwang J Y, Sun Y K. Nano/microstructured silicon-graphite composite anode for high-energy-density Li-ion battery[J]. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(2): 2624-2633.
[4]
Goodenough J B, Park K S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(4): 1167-1176.
doi: 10.1021/ja3091438
pmid: 23294028
[5]
Xu W, Wang J L, Ding F, Chen X L, Nasybutin E, Zhang Y H, Zhang J G. Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries[J]. Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7(2): 513-537.
doi: 10.1039/C3EE40795K
URL
[6]
Lin D C, Liu Y Y, Cui Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries[J]. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2017, 12(3): 194-206.
doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.16
URL
[7]
Zheng J M, Engelhard M H, Mei D H, Jiao S H, Polzin B J, Zhang J G, Xu W. Electrolyte additive enabled fast charging and stable cycling lithium metal batteries[J]. Nat. Energy, 2017, 2(3): 17012.
doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.12
URL
[8]
Huang C, Xiao J, Shao Y Y, Zheng J M, Bennett W D, Lu D P, Saraf L V, Engelhard M, Ji L W, Zhang J G, Li X L, Graff G L, Liu J. Manipulating surface reactions in lithium-sulphur batteries using hybrid anode structures[J]. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 3015.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms4015
URL
[9]
Xie J, Lu Y C. A retrospective on lithium-ion batteries[J]. Nat. Commun, 2020, 11(1): 2499.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16259-9
URL
[10] Xu X L, Wang S J, Wang H, Hu C, Jin Y, Liu J B, Yan H. Recent progresses in the suppression method based on the growth mechanism of lithium dendrite[J]. Energy Chem., 2018, 27(2): 513-527.
[11]
Wang X F, Li Y J, Meng Y S. Cryogenic electron microscopy for characterizing and diagnosing batteries[J]. Joule, 2018, 2(11): 2225-2234.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.005
URL
[12]
Nandasiri M I, Camacho-Forero L E, Schwarz A M, Shut-thanandan V, Thevuthasan S, Balbuena P B, Mueller, K T, Murugesan V. In situ chemical imaging of solid-electrolyte interphase layer evolution in Li-S batteries[J]. Chem. Mater., 2017, 29(11): 4728-4737.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00374
URL
[13]
Wang Y M, Liu Y C, Tu Y Q, Wang Q. Reductive decomposition of solvents and additives toward solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion battery[J]. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2020, 124(17): 9099-9108.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10535
URL
[14]
van Duin A C T, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard W A. ReaxFF: A reactive force field for hydrocarbons[J]. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105(41): 9396-9409.
doi: 10.1021/jp004368u
URL
[15]
Chenoweth K, van Duin A C T, Goddard W A. ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation[J]. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112(5): 1040-1053.
doi: 10.1021/jp709896w
pmid: 18197648
[16]
Bedrov D, Smith G D, van Duin A C T. Reactions of singly-reduced ethylene carbonate in lithium battery electrolytes: A molecular dynamics simulation study using the ReaxFF[J]. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2012, 116(11): 2978-2985.
doi: 10.1021/jp210345b
URL
[17]
Liu Y, Yu P P, Wu Y, Yang H, Xie M, Huai L Y, Goddard W A, Cheng T. The DFT-ReaxFF hybrid reactive dynamics method with application to the reductive decomposition reaction of the TFSI and DOL electrolyte at a lithium-metal anode surface[J]. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2021, 12(4): 1300-1306.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03720
URL
[18]
Liu Y, Sun Q T, Yu P P, Wu Y, Xu L, Yang H, Xie M, Cheng T, Goddard W A. Effects of high and low salt concentrations in electrolytes at lithium-metal anode surfaces using DFT-ReaxFF hybrid molecular dynamics method[J]. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2021, 12(11): 2922-2929.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00279
URL
[19] Islam M M, Bryantsev V S, van Duin A C T. ReaxFF reactive force field simulations on the influence of Teflon on electrolyte decomposition during Li/SWCNT anode discharge in lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2014, 161(8): E3009-E3014.
[20]
Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A W, Rosenbluth M N, Teller A H, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines[J]. J. Chem. Phys., 1953, 21(6): 1087-1092.
doi: 10.1063/1.1699114
URL
[21]
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated annealing[J]. Science, 1983, 220(4598): 671-680.
pmid: 17813860
[22]
Becke A D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. the role of exact exchange[J]. J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98(7): 5648-5652.
doi: 10.1063/1.464913
URL
[23]
Qian J F, Henderson W A, Xu W, Bhattacharya P, Engelhard M, Borodin O, Zhang J G. High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode[J]. Nat. Commun., 2015, 6: 6362.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7362
URL
[24]
Li N W, Yin Y X, Yang C P, Guo Y G. An artificial solid electrolyte interphase layer for stable lithium metal anodes[J]. Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(9): 1853-1858.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201504526
URL
[25] Menkin S, Golodnitsky D, Peled E. Artificial solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) for improved cycle ability and safety of lithium-ion cells for EV applications[J]. Electro-chem. Commun., 2009, 11(9): 1789-1791.
[26]
Camacho-Forero L E, Smith T W, Bertolini S, Balbuena P B. Reactivity at the lithium-metal anode surface of lithium-sulfur batteries[J]. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119(48): 26828-26839.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08254
URL
[27]
Yun K S, Pai S J, Yeo B C, Lee K R, Kim S J, Han S S. Simulation protocol for prediction of a solid-electrolyte interphase on the silicon-based anodes of a lithium-ion battery: ReaxFF reactive force field[J]. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2017, 8(13): 2812-2818.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00898
URL
Included in
Computational Chemistry Commons, Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Power and Energy Commons